header-logo header-logo

24 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Government gets to work on 40 Bills

From planning to arbitration, lawyers welcomed a bumper package of 40 bills in Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s first King’s Speech

The Arbitration Bill, introduced in the House of Lords this week, implements Law Commission recommendations to improve the Arbitration Act. Bar Council Chair Sam Townend KC called the Bill an ‘important reform’ that will help London maintain ‘its deserved reputation as the foremost centre for international arbitration. The hard currency and soft power value to the country of the legal services sector, the most liberal and open in the world, and already constituting 10% of the global legal economy, should not be understated’.

On the issue of court delays, the Victims, Courts and Public Protection Bill will allow associate prosecutors to work on appropriate cases, and create specialist courts at every Crown Court to fast-track rape cases.

Welcoming a Bill to modernise the asylum and immigration system, Katie Newbury, partner, Kingsley Napley, said she hoped it would include ‘repeal of the Illegal Migration Act which inhibits proper consideration of asylum claims and the introduction of safe and legal routes for those wishing to seek international protection in the UK’.

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill—key to the government’s growth agenda—will reform compulsory purchase compensation, modernise planning committees and speed up decision-making.

Ben Standing, partner, Browne Jacobson, recommended the government define the ‘grey belt’, simplify the process whereby councils update their local plans and ‘clarify what the planning system will prioritise when giving weight to various considerations’.

Law Society President Nick Emmerson welcomed the Employment Rights Bill’s ‘focus on improving dispute resolution and enforcement’. It aims to deliver a genuine living wage, ban exploitative zero-hours contracts and ‘fire-and-rehire’ practices, and make parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal available from day one. However, probationary periods for new hires will stay.
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll