header-logo header-logo

24 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Government gets to work on 40 Bills

From planning to arbitration, lawyers welcomed a bumper package of 40 bills in Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s first King’s Speech

The Arbitration Bill, introduced in the House of Lords this week, implements Law Commission recommendations to improve the Arbitration Act. Bar Council Chair Sam Townend KC called the Bill an ‘important reform’ that will help London maintain ‘its deserved reputation as the foremost centre for international arbitration. The hard currency and soft power value to the country of the legal services sector, the most liberal and open in the world, and already constituting 10% of the global legal economy, should not be understated’.

On the issue of court delays, the Victims, Courts and Public Protection Bill will allow associate prosecutors to work on appropriate cases, and create specialist courts at every Crown Court to fast-track rape cases.

Welcoming a Bill to modernise the asylum and immigration system, Katie Newbury, partner, Kingsley Napley, said she hoped it would include ‘repeal of the Illegal Migration Act which inhibits proper consideration of asylum claims and the introduction of safe and legal routes for those wishing to seek international protection in the UK’.

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill—key to the government’s growth agenda—will reform compulsory purchase compensation, modernise planning committees and speed up decision-making.

Ben Standing, partner, Browne Jacobson, recommended the government define the ‘grey belt’, simplify the process whereby councils update their local plans and ‘clarify what the planning system will prioritise when giving weight to various considerations’.

Law Society President Nick Emmerson welcomed the Employment Rights Bill’s ‘focus on improving dispute resolution and enforcement’. It aims to deliver a genuine living wage, ban exploitative zero-hours contracts and ‘fire-and-rehire’ practices, and make parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal available from day one. However, probationary periods for new hires will stay.
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll