header-logo header-logo

06 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Animal welfare , International
printer mail-detail

Government urged to take action on animal cruelty tourism

A collaboration of more than 100 animal charities and campaigners have signed an open letter co-organised by a solicitor urging the Environment Secretary to bring the Animals (Low-Welfare Activities Abroad) Act 2023 into effect.

The Act seeks to ban the advertising and sale of activities involving animals overseas that would be illegal if those activities were happening in the UK, such as elephant rides, tiger selfies or performing dolphins. In a letter sent this week to Steve Reed, Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Low-Welfare Act Coalition writes: ‘It is now approaching 18 months since the 2023 Act became law.

‘Whilst we appreciate the government’s busy agenda, we have received no indication that its implementation is a priority for this government. Implementation is a tangible way for government to enact its promise. We urge you to seize this opportunity and prioritise implementation.

‘We are particularly concerned by indications from your department that, far from implementing the 2023 Act, priority may be given to “non legislative routes to influence behaviour change”. The compulsion of legislation was and remains required in this area precisely because non-legislative measures, such as unmonitored and unregulated voluntary codes put forward by the travel industry, have consistently proved ineffectual in reducing the suffering of animals as part of holiday packages advertised in the UK.’

Solicitor Duncan McNair, litigation partner at Spencer West, is the chief executive of Save the Asian Elephants and joint co-ordinator of the Low-Welfare Act Coalition.

Save the Asian Elephants reports that elephants used in tourism are taken from the wild when young and trained into obedience so as to be safe near tourists. This involves isolation, deprivation of food, water and sleep, and beating and stabbing with rods, chains and bullhooks. This treatment sometimes results in death.

The charity highlights that other endangered species can also suffer and die in tourism such as monkeys, lions, tigers, bears and dolphins, and humans can die or be injured by captive wild animals.

About 1,200 UK companies currently advertise some 300 or more venues abroad where such treatment happens to elephants.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll