header-logo header-logo

Government urged to take action on animal cruelty tourism

06 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Animal welfare , International
printer mail-detail
A collaboration of more than 100 animal charities and campaigners have signed an open letter co-organised by a solicitor urging the Environment Secretary to bring the Animals (Low-Welfare Activities Abroad) Act 2023 into effect.

The Act seeks to ban the advertising and sale of activities involving animals overseas that would be illegal if those activities were happening in the UK, such as elephant rides, tiger selfies or performing dolphins. In a letter sent this week to Steve Reed, Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Low-Welfare Act Coalition writes: ‘It is now approaching 18 months since the 2023 Act became law.

‘Whilst we appreciate the government’s busy agenda, we have received no indication that its implementation is a priority for this government. Implementation is a tangible way for government to enact its promise. We urge you to seize this opportunity and prioritise implementation.

‘We are particularly concerned by indications from your department that, far from implementing the 2023 Act, priority may be given to “non legislative routes to influence behaviour change”. The compulsion of legislation was and remains required in this area precisely because non-legislative measures, such as unmonitored and unregulated voluntary codes put forward by the travel industry, have consistently proved ineffectual in reducing the suffering of animals as part of holiday packages advertised in the UK.’

Solicitor Duncan McNair, litigation partner at Spencer West, is the chief executive of Save the Asian Elephants and joint co-ordinator of the Low-Welfare Act Coalition.

Save the Asian Elephants reports that elephants used in tourism are taken from the wild when young and trained into obedience so as to be safe near tourists. This involves isolation, deprivation of food, water and sleep, and beating and stabbing with rods, chains and bullhooks. This treatment sometimes results in death.

The charity highlights that other endangered species can also suffer and die in tourism such as monkeys, lions, tigers, bears and dolphins, and humans can die or be injured by captive wild animals.

About 1,200 UK companies currently advertise some 300 or more venues abroad where such treatment happens to elephants.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll