header-logo header-logo

Grasping the costs nettle

18 June 2009 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan proposes a simple solution to the ongoing costs fiasco—proportionality

No party has ever paid out costs to an opponent unless either those costs have been agreed or the court has determined what should be paid.

The recent Jackson report comes up with myriad possibilities to control the level of costs (see Civil Litigation Costs Review, Preliminary Report by Lord Justice Jackson).

However, for a decade there has been a simple weapon which has hardly been deployed—proportionality. Costs are almost invariably awarded on the standard basis and CPR 44 (2) dictates that such costs be proportionate.

Ambitious claims

Where does the blame fall for the failure to apply proportionality? Some judges have done sterling work. When sitting as the designated civil judge in Birmingham His Honour Alistair MacDuff regularly waded in and slapped down ambitious claims for costs. Little wonder that he was elevated to the High Court bench. The current designated civil judge in Liverpool, His Honour Judge Stewart QC, is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll