header-logo header-logo

Great changes

03 May 2012 / Anthony Connerty
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Anthony Connerty provides a guide to the 2012 revision of the rules of CIETAC

The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission—CIETAC—is one of the world’s major permanent arbitration institutions. On a case-load basis it is one of the busiest of the arbitral institutions. Formerly known as the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission, CIETAC was set up in April 1956. CIETAC has its headquarters in Beijing and has four sub-commissions in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Tianjin and Chongqing.

Pattern of international arbitration rules

The rules of the major international commercial arbitral institutions such as CIETAC tend to follow a similar pattern, and broadly will set out rules covering an arbitration from its commencement through to the making of the award.

The 74 Articles of the CIETAC 2012 rules are divided into six chapters covering general provisions, the arbitration proceedings, the award, summary procedure, special provisions for domestic procedure and supplementary provisions.

This article looks at some of the significant changes made to the CIETAC rules by the 2012 revision. Some of the changes are aimed at giving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll