header-logo header-logo

03 May 2012 / Anthony Connerty
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Great changes

Anthony Connerty provides a guide to the 2012 revision of the rules of CIETAC

The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission—CIETAC—is one of the world’s major permanent arbitration institutions. On a case-load basis it is one of the busiest of the arbitral institutions. Formerly known as the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission, CIETAC was set up in April 1956. CIETAC has its headquarters in Beijing and has four sub-commissions in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Tianjin and Chongqing.

Pattern of international arbitration rules

The rules of the major international commercial arbitral institutions such as CIETAC tend to follow a similar pattern, and broadly will set out rules covering an arbitration from its commencement through to the making of the award.

The 74 Articles of the CIETAC 2012 rules are divided into six chapters covering general provisions, the arbitration proceedings, the award, summary procedure, special provisions for domestic procedure and supplementary provisions.

This article looks at some of the significant changes made to the CIETAC rules by the 2012 revision. Some of the changes are aimed at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll