header-logo header-logo

The great divide

09 December 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris calls for reform of the law surrounding cohabitation

The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov) and I for one called it wrong. Not as to the outcome, which on the facts seems fair and reasonable, but as to the lack of a dissenting judgment. The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal and restored the order of the county court which provided for Kernott to receive 10% of the equity in the property he had jointly purchased with Jones in 1985.

The facts of the case are well-rehearsed (see NLJ, 18 November 2011, p 1571). Lord Walker and Lady Hale gave the lead judgment. Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale and added some reflections of his own. Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed with the result but reached it by a different route.

The judgment had been eagerly awaited by family lawyers. Cohabitant cases had been put on hold in anticipation of the outcome. Six

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll