header-logo header-logo

09 December 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

The great divide

Geraldine Morris calls for reform of the law surrounding cohabitation

The Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov) and I for one called it wrong. Not as to the outcome, which on the facts seems fair and reasonable, but as to the lack of a dissenting judgment. The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal and restored the order of the county court which provided for Kernott to receive 10% of the equity in the property he had jointly purchased with Jones in 1985.

The facts of the case are well-rehearsed (see NLJ, 18 November 2011, p 1571). Lord Walker and Lady Hale gave the lead judgment. Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale and added some reflections of his own. Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed with the result but reached it by a different route.

The judgment had been eagerly awaited by family lawyers. Cohabitant cases had been put on hold in anticipation of the outcome. Six

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll