header-logo header-logo

The great escape

Gross misconduct is no barrier to pay in lieu of notice, notes Anna Macey

In Cavenagh v William Evans Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 697 Duncan Cavenagh was the managing director of William Evans Limited. Exercising a clause in Cavenagh’s contract, the company summarily terminated his employment, acknowledging their contractual obligation to pay Cavanagh six months’ pay in lieu of notice (PILON).

Before the £65,000 due was paid, the company became aware that two months before the termination, Cavenagh had authorised a transfer of £10,000 from company funds to his pension provider. The company refused to pay the PILON, and Cavenagh sued for the payment as a debt due under his contract.

Boston Deep Sea Fishing

Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, as the Court of Appeal acknowledged, is a leading authority for many of the principles governing dismissal for gross misconduct. It established that an employee may be dismissed summarily for gross misconduct, and critically that an employer can defend a claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll