header-logo header-logo

The great escape

Gross misconduct is no barrier to pay in lieu of notice, notes Anna Macey

In Cavenagh v William Evans Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 697 Duncan Cavenagh was the managing director of William Evans Limited. Exercising a clause in Cavenagh’s contract, the company summarily terminated his employment, acknowledging their contractual obligation to pay Cavanagh six months’ pay in lieu of notice (PILON).

Before the £65,000 due was paid, the company became aware that two months before the termination, Cavenagh had authorised a transfer of £10,000 from company funds to his pension provider. The company refused to pay the PILON, and Cavenagh sued for the payment as a debt due under his contract.

Boston Deep Sea Fishing

Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, as the Court of Appeal acknowledged, is a leading authority for many of the principles governing dismissal for gross misconduct. It established that an employee may be dismissed summarily for gross misconduct, and critically that an employer can defend a claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll