header-logo header-logo

Green-eyed monster

12 May 2011 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Feed-in tariffs: thinking big, or redefining small, asks Malcolm Dowden

Feed-tariffs (FiTs) were introduced in April 2010 to promote investment in and uptake of “small-scale” renewable and low carbon electricity generation technologies. The scheme requires licensed electricity suppliers (FiT licensees) to pay a generation tariff to small-scale low-carbon generators for:

  • electricity generated (whether or not that electricity is exported to the national grid); and
  • an export tariff to them where electricity is also exported to the national grid.

The scheme is applicable to a number of technologies up to a maximum capacity of 5MW. However, the Coalition government has proposed amendments, due to take effect on 1 August 2011, limiting full payments under the scheme in respect of solar photovoltaic (solar pv) installations to 50kW, with significantly reduced incentives for installations between 250kW and 5MW. The Coalition government’s decision was preceded by a series of announcements by minister of state Greg Barker characterising use of FiTs for commercial-scale solar pv installations as “abuse” of a scheme designed for small-scale domestic installations. Chris Huhne adopted similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll