header-logo header-logo

12 May 2011 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Green-eyed monster

Feed-in tariffs: thinking big, or redefining small, asks Malcolm Dowden

Feed-tariffs (FiTs) were introduced in April 2010 to promote investment in and uptake of “small-scale” renewable and low carbon electricity generation technologies. The scheme requires licensed electricity suppliers (FiT licensees) to pay a generation tariff to small-scale low-carbon generators for:

  • electricity generated (whether or not that electricity is exported to the national grid); and
  • an export tariff to them where electricity is also exported to the national grid.

The scheme is applicable to a number of technologies up to a maximum capacity of 5MW. However, the Coalition government has proposed amendments, due to take effect on 1 August 2011, limiting full payments under the scheme in respect of solar photovoltaic (solar pv) installations to 50kW, with significantly reduced incentives for installations between 250kW and 5MW. The Coalition government’s decision was preceded by a series of announcements by minister of state Greg Barker characterising use of FiTs for commercial-scale solar pv installations as “abuse” of a scheme designed for small-scale domestic installations. Chris Huhne adopted similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll