header-logo header-logo

21 July 2016 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Grey days

nlj_7708_smith

Is our Constitution fit for purpose following Brexit, asks Roger Smith

The British constitution has taken rather too much of a battering from public school boys in both major political parties. Chilcot and Brexit have, in different ways, revealed the inadequacies of an education that encourages confidence unmerited by circumstance. And Oxford University might care also to consider whether its PPE degree really provides adequately profound training for those who would be our leaders. The most immediate consequence of a comprehensive failure of our previous political elite is that the women have emerged to try their hand at getting us out of the mess that the boys created. But, there are deeper issues and we need to consider whether, in the language of our time, our constitution remains fit for purpose.

The Union

The first problem is our very survival as a coherent nation. The SNP has little political option domestically but to push for a further referendum on independence even if falling oil prices make that financially even more bonkers than voting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll