header-logo header-logo

Grey days

21 July 2016 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7708_smith

Is our Constitution fit for purpose following Brexit, asks Roger Smith

The British constitution has taken rather too much of a battering from public school boys in both major political parties. Chilcot and Brexit have, in different ways, revealed the inadequacies of an education that encourages confidence unmerited by circumstance. And Oxford University might care also to consider whether its PPE degree really provides adequately profound training for those who would be our leaders. The most immediate consequence of a comprehensive failure of our previous political elite is that the women have emerged to try their hand at getting us out of the mess that the boys created. But, there are deeper issues and we need to consider whether, in the language of our time, our constitution remains fit for purpose.

The Union

The first problem is our very survival as a coherent nation. The SNP has little political option domestically but to push for a further referendum on independence even if falling oil prices make that financially even more bonkers than voting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll