header-logo header-logo

21 July 2016 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Grey days

nlj_7708_smith

Is our Constitution fit for purpose following Brexit, asks Roger Smith

The British constitution has taken rather too much of a battering from public school boys in both major political parties. Chilcot and Brexit have, in different ways, revealed the inadequacies of an education that encourages confidence unmerited by circumstance. And Oxford University might care also to consider whether its PPE degree really provides adequately profound training for those who would be our leaders. The most immediate consequence of a comprehensive failure of our previous political elite is that the women have emerged to try their hand at getting us out of the mess that the boys created. But, there are deeper issues and we need to consider whether, in the language of our time, our constitution remains fit for purpose.

The Union

The first problem is our very survival as a coherent nation. The SNP has little political option domestically but to push for a further referendum on independence even if falling oil prices make that financially even more bonkers than voting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll