header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Guarantee

Ibrahim v Barclays Bank plc and another [2012] EWCA Civ 640, [2012] All ER (D) 25 (Jun)

 

Payment by a third party to a creditor under legal compulsion on account of a debt owed by a debtor would automatically discharge the debtor’s debt. That was the case even if the legal compulsion arose out of a contractual obligation voluntarily assumed by the third party. Where a case was one of payment under compulsion, questions of agency, authority and ratification did not arise. The obligation of an issuing bank under a letter of credit was to honour the credit on presentation of compliant documents, as specified in the letter of credit itself.

The general view was that the seller looked to the letter of credit for payment of the price. Thus, when an issuing bank honoured a letter of credit, its payment would discharge the obligation that had given rise to the need for the letter of credit, but it was important to be clear about the scope of the autonomy principle, which did not preclude looking at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll