header-logo header-logo

Guardianship v adoption

23 March 2007 / John Mitchell
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

John Mitchell compares recent developments in guardianship orders with the current rules on adoption

Since December 2005 courts have been able to make special guardianship orders (SGOs) under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 14A. These give former foster parents, relatives and others what the white paper, Adoption, A New Approach (2000) Cm 5017 described as “clear responsibility for all aspects of caring for a child” and a status greater than that provided by a residence order but less than adoption.

The Court of Appeal has recently provided guidance on how the new powers should be used. The SGO is intended to build what the white paper called “a legally secure, stable permanent placement”, in part by restricting the exercise of parental responsibility by the child’s parents and requiring them to obtain the leave of the court before applying for any s 8 order other than a residence order. A strong message from the Court of Appeal is that the issue of whether or not to make an SGO is of “fundamental importance”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll