header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Guilty until proven innocent?

Alec Samuels explores justice & compensation for the quashed imprisoned

In brief

  • The effects on the claimant in R (Hallam).
  • The role of the Human Rights Act in miscarriages of justice.

R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2, [2020] AC 279: the appellant was suspected, charged, prosecuted, tried, convicted and imprisoned. He had pleaded not guilty. He submitted his case to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), who referred the case to the Court of Appeal, who subsequently allowed the appeal. The conviction was unsafe. He was acquitted. He was released from prison after 17 (sic) years. He was not retried. The police did not say that they were not looking for anybody else. He applied for compensation. He was refused. The impact upon the claimant was horrific: irretrievable loss of 17 years of life, loss of reputation, loss of job, loss of marriage, loss of home.

Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice, Criminal Justice Act 1988 as amended:

S 133(1) ‘…when a person has been convicted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll