header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Guilty until proven innocent?

Alec Samuels explores justice & compensation for the quashed imprisoned

In brief

  • The effects on the claimant in R (Hallam).
  • The role of the Human Rights Act in miscarriages of justice.

R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2, [2020] AC 279: the appellant was suspected, charged, prosecuted, tried, convicted and imprisoned. He had pleaded not guilty. He submitted his case to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), who referred the case to the Court of Appeal, who subsequently allowed the appeal. The conviction was unsafe. He was acquitted. He was released from prison after 17 (sic) years. He was not retried. The police did not say that they were not looking for anybody else. He applied for compensation. He was refused. The impact upon the claimant was horrific: irretrievable loss of 17 years of life, loss of reputation, loss of job, loss of marriage, loss of home.

Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice, Criminal Justice Act 1988 as amended:

S 133(1) ‘…when a person has been convicted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll