header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 February 2026 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Governance , Company
printer mail-detail

Guralp v SFO—a narrow squeak?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
242566
The Guralp case has given the Serious Fraud Office a welcome boost, writes Jonathan Fisher KC, but lessons can still be learned
  • The ruling in Guralp allows the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to take enforcement action after a key term of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) had been breached by a defendant company.
  • It is essential that terms of a DPA must be simply stated. And the SFO would be well advised to improve its arrangements for diarising important dates and allowing a margin around them.
  • The SFO may also reflect on whether a DPA ought to have been made in a case where a company is unable to pay a fine and legal costs.

Last month’s High Court ruling in Guralp Systems Ltd v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2026] EWHC 37 (Admin) gives a much-needed boost to the fortunes of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), recently battered by the loss of R v Hayes; R v Palombo [2025] UKSC 29 in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Burnout behind the billable hour
Behind the profession’s polished exterior, lawyers are ‘internally drained rather than physically tired’, according to a stark assessment of burnout in legal practice
NLJ this week: Domestic abuse reforms still falling short
Five years after the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 came into force, concerns remain that the family courts continue to minimise allegations of abuse in child contact disputes
NLJ this week: Uber’s legal shield faces scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
NLJ this week: Hereditary peers era finally comes to an end
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
NLJ this week: Is it finally time to scrap Part III?
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll