header-logo header-logo

Habeas corpus—Jurisdiction—Prisoner of war

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another [2011] EWHC 2008 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 279 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Divisional Court, Laws LJ and Silber J, 29 July 2011

Neither the secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs nor the secretary of state for defence possesses the necessary power or control to be able to direct the delivery up of a Pakistani national prisoner of war captured by British forces who is being held by the US at an airbase in Afghanistan.

Nathalie Lieven QC, Ben Jaffey and Tristan Jones (instructed by Leigh Day) for the claimant. James Eadie QC and Ben Watson (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretaries of state.

The applicant was a national of Pakistan. In February 2004, he was captured by British forces in Iraq and handed over to US forces. Thereafter he was held at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan (Bagram). In June 2010, a US detainee review board determined that his continued internment was “not necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll