header-logo header-logo

Habeas corpus—Jurisdiction—Prisoner of war

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another [2011] EWHC 2008 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 279 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Divisional Court, Laws LJ and Silber J, 29 July 2011

Neither the secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs nor the secretary of state for defence possesses the necessary power or control to be able to direct the delivery up of a Pakistani national prisoner of war captured by British forces who is being held by the US at an airbase in Afghanistan.

Nathalie Lieven QC, Ben Jaffey and Tristan Jones (instructed by Leigh Day) for the claimant. James Eadie QC and Ben Watson (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretaries of state.

The applicant was a national of Pakistan. In February 2004, he was captured by British forces in Iraq and handed over to US forces. Thereafter he was held at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan (Bagram). In June 2010, a US detainee review board determined that his continued internment was “not necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll