header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Habeas corpus—Jurisdiction—Prisoner of war

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another [2011] EWHC 2008 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 279 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Divisional Court, Laws LJ and Silber J, 29 July 2011

Neither the secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs nor the secretary of state for defence possesses the necessary power or control to be able to direct the delivery up of a Pakistani national prisoner of war captured by British forces who is being held by the US at an airbase in Afghanistan.

Nathalie Lieven QC, Ben Jaffey and Tristan Jones (instructed by Leigh Day) for the claimant. James Eadie QC and Ben Watson (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretaries of state.

The applicant was a national of Pakistan. In February 2004, he was captured by British forces in Iraq and handed over to US forces. Thereafter he was held at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan (Bagram). In June 2010, a US detainee review board determined that his continued internment was “not necessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll