header-logo header-logo

Hacker appeal refused

17 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Gary McKinnon, the Asperger’s sufferer who faces extradition to the US for hacking into Pentagon military networks, has been refused permission to apply for judicial review against the director of public prosecutions.

Gary McKinnon, the Asperger’s sufferer who faces extradition to the US for hacking into Pentagon military networks, has been refused permission to apply for judicial review against the director of public prosecutions.

In R (on the application of Gary McKinnon) v Home Secretary [2009] EWHC 2449 (Admin), Stanley Burnton LJ found McKinnon’s extradition was “a lawful and proportionate response to his alleged offending” and that the case did not raise “points of general public importance”.

He added that McKinnon would be unlikely to succeed with his claim that extradition would breach his right to a private and family life, under Art 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention).

He also rejected McKinnon’s argument that extradition to the US would be a breach of his right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment under Art 3 of the Convention.

This ends McKinnon’s legal options in the UK. However, his solicitors, Kaim Todner, may now decide to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.
McKinnon’s legal team claim he was looking for reports on UFOs, a subject with which he was obsessed.

A Home Office spokesman commented: “We note the court’s judgment on the 9 October 2009.

“The case remains before the courts; therefore, we do not propose to comment further at this stage.”

Issue: 7389 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll