header-logo header-logo

Hale on privacy in the family court

24 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

The rules on when journalists can report from the family court and when they can’t ‘need to be simple, clear, coherent and accessible and they are not’, Lady Hale has said.

Giving the Sir Nicholas Wall Memorial Lecture on ‘Openness and privacy in family proceedings’, Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, called for more clarity on the subject of court reporting.

She questioned whether it was ‘right that the general rule is that civil courts sit in public unless…, while family courts sit in private unless…?’ Perhaps the Family Procedure Rules should be more specific about the principles governing the decision to sit in public, she said.

And while the point of publication of information is to raise public confidence, ‘can the public be confident if the judge is judge in what might be seen as his or her own cause?’

Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll