header-logo header-logo

24 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Hale on privacy in the family court

The rules on when journalists can report from the family court and when they can’t ‘need to be simple, clear, coherent and accessible and they are not’, Lady Hale has said.

Giving the Sir Nicholas Wall Memorial Lecture on ‘Openness and privacy in family proceedings’, Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, called for more clarity on the subject of court reporting.

She questioned whether it was ‘right that the general rule is that civil courts sit in public unless…, while family courts sit in private unless…?’ Perhaps the Family Procedure Rules should be more specific about the principles governing the decision to sit in public, she said.

And while the point of publication of information is to raise public confidence, ‘can the public be confident if the judge is judge in what might be seen as his or her own cause?’

Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll