header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Hamilton for lawyers #3

Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet

Alexander Hamilton was a soldier, a politician and, notably, a lawyer. Articles in this series, inspired by Lin-Manuel Miranda’s eponymous hip-hop musical, have already touched on his negotiating skills (‘The Room Where It Happens’), his advocacy in the many essays he wrote as part of The Federalist Papers on behalf of his adopted client, the new US constitution (‘Hamilton for lawyers’, 167 NLJ 7761, p22), and the way in which his ‘Ten Duel Commandments’ can form the basis for a theory of litigation (‘Hamilton for lawyers #2’, NLJ 23 February 2018, p22).

However, his most notable piece of written advocacy, and one he deployed entirely in his own interests, is found in the work entitled Observations on certain documents contained in no. V & VI of “The History of the United States for the Year 1796,” in which the charge of speculation against Alexander Hamilton, late secretary of the Treasury, is fully refuted. Written by himself. Or, more briefly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll