header-logo header-logo

Hamilton for lawyers #3

04 October 2018 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet

Alexander Hamilton was a soldier, a politician and, notably, a lawyer. Articles in this series, inspired by Lin-Manuel Miranda’s eponymous hip-hop musical, have already touched on his negotiating skills (‘The Room Where It Happens’), his advocacy in the many essays he wrote as part of The Federalist Papers on behalf of his adopted client, the new US constitution (‘Hamilton for lawyers’, 167 NLJ 7761, p22), and the way in which his ‘Ten Duel Commandments’ can form the basis for a theory of litigation (‘Hamilton for lawyers #2’, NLJ 23 February 2018, p22).

However, his most notable piece of written advocacy, and one he deployed entirely in his own interests, is found in the work entitled Observations on certain documents contained in no. V & VI of “The History of the United States for the Year 1796,” in which the charge of speculation against Alexander Hamilton, late secretary of the Treasury, is fully refuted. Written by himself. Or, more briefly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll