header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Hamilton for lawyers #3

Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet

Alexander Hamilton was a soldier, a politician and, notably, a lawyer. Articles in this series, inspired by Lin-Manuel Miranda’s eponymous hip-hop musical, have already touched on his negotiating skills (‘The Room Where It Happens’), his advocacy in the many essays he wrote as part of The Federalist Papers on behalf of his adopted client, the new US constitution (‘Hamilton for lawyers’, 167 NLJ 7761, p22), and the way in which his ‘Ten Duel Commandments’ can form the basis for a theory of litigation (‘Hamilton for lawyers #2’, NLJ 23 February 2018, p22).

However, his most notable piece of written advocacy, and one he deployed entirely in his own interests, is found in the work entitled Observations on certain documents contained in no. V & VI of “The History of the United States for the Year 1796,” in which the charge of speculation against Alexander Hamilton, late secretary of the Treasury, is fully refuted. Written by himself. Or, more briefly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll