header-logo header-logo

Hands off!

14 August 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7665_zander

A Bill of Rights is not to be messed with: Michael Zander on the Tory plan to scrap the Human Rights Act

The government’s plan to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights was explained in Protecting Human Rights in the UK: The Conservatives’ Proposals for Changing Britain’s Human Rights Laws (October 2014).

The British Bill of Rights, like the Human Rights Act, it said, would be based on the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention): “There is nothing wrong with that original document, which contains a sensible mix of checks and balances alongside the rights it sets out, and is a laudable statement of the principles for a modern democratic nation”.

But, the proposals stated, while the Convention would be put into primary legislation: “The use of the new law will be limited to cases that involve criminal law and the liberty of an individual, the right to property and similar serious matters”.

Lost causes?

Where, one asks, does that leave Art 3 (torture and inhuman or degrading treatment),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll