header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Happy holidays?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
29 July 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
25108
Questions about entitlement to holidays & how holiday pay is calculated have rarely been more prominent, says Charles Pigott

In brief

  • Two sets of amendments to the holiday-related provisions of the Working Time Regulations came into effect during lockdown.
  • These changes intertwine with some novel questions about holiday entitlement for workers furloughed under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.
  • In the meantime, the courts continue to grapple with some long-standing issues about the calculation of holiday pay.

Paradoxically in this far from typical holiday season, questions about entitlement to holidays and how holiday pay is calculated have rarely been more prominent.

Carrying forward leave

The Working Time (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/365) (the 2020 Regulations) came into effect on 26 March, three days after the national lockdown started.

The 2020 Regulations amend reg 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) (WTR 1998), which provides for the core four week entitlement to annual leave deriving from the Working Time Directive (now consolidated as Directive 2003/88/EC) (WTD). This leave cannot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll