header-logo header-logo

Happy travels… with consumer-friendly insurance

172566
Mark Lee & Teja Picton-Howell assess the impact of the Consumer Duty on travel insurance products & distribution
  • The FCA’s Consumer Duty takes an outcomes-based, rather than box-ticking, approach.
  • Includes suggestions to help firms understand and comply with the new approach.
  • Looks at the two most common consumer complaints for legal expenses exclusions.

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA’s) ‘new’ Consumer Duty is no longer so new. The rule has been in force for sales of ‘open’ products and services since 31 July 2023, and applies to ‘closed’ products and services from 31 July 2024.

Much commentary and guidance has been published about the Consumer Duty, including helpful updates on its implementation by the FCA, giving examples of good practice and areas for improvement. We need not, therefore, go into any detailed analysis of the scope of the duty here, because this is already widely available. Instead, we will focus on the impact of the duty on travel insurance products and distribution.

What it is

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll