header-logo header-logo

04 October 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Hard at work

Ian Smith reviews a group of cases on compensation for unfair dismissal & one teeming with EU-driven complications

Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy UKEATS/0015/12 is an example of a seemingly simple issue of holiday entitlement giving rise to legal complexities under the working time regulations and Directive. After a stroke in July 2010, the claimant was off sick until June 2011, when he resigned. His holiday year was the calendar year; in 2010 he had taken 11 holiday days before his illness; in 2011 he had taken nothing because of his illness. He had made no claim for holiday pay in 2010. On termination in 2011, he claimed outstanding holiday pay in lieu of untaken holiday.

The tribunal held that EU law requires the carrying over of holiday entitlement untaken because of illness, and on the basis that it is all unpaid “wages”, the claimant was entitled to 17 days’ holiday pay for 2010 and a pro-rata 14 days for 2011, ie using the full 28 days of ordinary and additional statutory leave (regs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll