header-logo header-logo

Hard work to reform tribunals

02 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers question proposed shake-up to employment tribunal system

Employment lawyers have expressed concern about proposed changes to the employment tribunal system.

Under the proposals, the qualifying period for unfair dismissal will double to two years, while employees will be charged fees for bringing tribunal claims. The fees would bring employment tribunals in line with family and civil courts. All claims arising out of employment disputes will first need to be lodged with Acas to allow pre-claim conciliation (PCC) to be offered.

Employment judges will be given powers to sit alone rather than with representatives for employee and employer when hearing unfair dismissal claims, and witness statements will be taken as read so that witnesses no longer need to attend hearings.

Nikki Duncan, employment partner at Bond Pearce, says: “Many of these proposals have been floated previously, some based on encouraging news of successful claims filters such as compulsory mediation in other legal jurisdictions. 

“However, when the Acas ‘gateway’ to claims was mooted two years ago, there was concern that people would be deterred from taking their claims further. The first year of PCC seems to have been quite successful, but we don’t yet know if Acas will be given any more resources for this.”

Duncan says Acas would be required to undertake PCC in an estimated additional 57,000 cases to those that are currently processed.

Esther Smith, employment law partner at Thomas Eggar LLP, says: “The imposition of a fee to commence a tribunal claim should reduce the number of claims submitted, but the increase in the qualification period for claiming unfair dismissal, from one year to two, is most unlikely to make any positive impact. 

“Those people with between one and two years’ service will still issue proceedings for other claims, such as discrimination or will try to argue that their dismissal falls within one of the categories for which no qualifying period of service is needed.

“Previous attempts to use Acas to reduce the burden on the tribunal system have done nothing to alleviate the problem.”

The consultation closes on 20 April.

Issue: 7451 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
back-to-top-scroll