header-logo header-logo

To have & have not

05 March 2010 / Shantanu Majumdar KC
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Professional negligence litigation comes in fashions. One of the latest arises from the vogue for after the event (ATE) legal expenses insurance obtained, usually by claimants on conditional fee agreements, as protection against any eventual liability to pay the defendants’ costs.

Axa

In Axa Insurance Ltd (formerly Winterthur Swiss Insurance Co) v Akther & Darby Solicitors [2009] EWCA Civ 1166, [2010] PNLR 10, [2009] All ER (D) 151 (Nov) the claimant insurer was the assignee of ATE policies issued under a scheme operated by a claims management company whereby a panel of solicitors took on personal injury claims from members of the public. Conditions of acceptance under the scheme were that each claim had to have at least a 51% chance of success and a likely quantum of more than £1,000 (in order to take it outside the restrictive costs rules of the small claims régime) and on acceptance of a qualifying claim an ATE policy was issued.

The claimant made severe losses from its involvement in the scheme and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll