header-logo header-logo

02 September 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Have you say on practising certificate fees

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is asking for feedback on its plans to change the rules on practising certificate fees

Its ‘Consultation on proposed practising fee rules’ covers fees paid by all lawyer categories whose regulators are governed by the LSB―including solicitors, barristers, legal executives, patent and trademark attorneys, costs lawyers and notaries. The LSB says it plans to increase transparency and accountability about how regulators spend fee income.

Currently, the fee can only be used for certain ‘permitted purposes’ set out in the Legal Services Act 2007 and LSB Rules. In the consultation, launched on 30 July, the LSB asks for feedback on new draft Rules.

Chris Nichols, LSB director, regulation and policy, says: ‘Practising certificate fees are a mandatory cost of regulation.

‘It is crucial that those being required to pay these fees can see where their money goes and are empowered to satisfy themselves that this represents value for money. In discussion with approved regulators, we have developed a draft framework that will put the onus on approved regulators to clearly articulate the purpose, value and costs of regulation.’

The LSB intends to implement the reformed rules by December 2020.

The consultation ends at 5pm on 8 October 2020. View it at: bit.ly/33a54de.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll