header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Costs
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Volunteers, promotions & perilous appeals

242564
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’

On capability dismissals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has clarified that employees must be judged by the work they were contractually employed to do—not what they might do if promoted. That casts doubt on ‘up or elsewhere’ models.

Meanwhile, a flexible approach to misconduct investigations endures—employers need not run a ‘Police force’ or a ‘Crown Court’ . And passing the EAT sift offers no shield from costs: ‘simply because a matter has been argued for some time does not mean that it was arguable’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll