On capability dismissals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has clarified that employees must be judged by the work they were contractually employed to do—not what they might do if promoted. That casts doubt on ‘up or elsewhere’ models.
Meanwhile, a flexible approach to misconduct investigations endures—employers need not run a ‘Police force’ or a ‘Crown Court’ . And passing the EAT sift offers no shield from costs: ‘simply because a matter has been argued for some time does not mean that it was arguable’.




