header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Costs
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 February 2026

242564
Volunteer workers, capability dismissals, & costs decisions with a sting in the tail: Ian Smith combs through the latest employment headlines
  • Key employment law rulings address when volunteers can qualify as ‘workers’, how capability dismissals must be assessed by reference to contractual duties rather than future roles, and the flexible, fact-specific nature of what constitutes a reasonable misconduct investigation.
  • Passing the Employment Appeal Tribunal sift does not protect an appellant from costs, reinforcing that appeals may still be deemed misconceived once fully argued.

Things are certainly hotting up on the legislative front, with the issuing of the first commencement order for the Employment Rights Act 2025 (SI 2026/3). This will be the first of many over the next 18 months or so. On the judicial front, the last month has seen four cases of some importance on matters of interpretation and application of the existing law. The first is a Court of Appeal decision on the employment status of volunteers, of importance to many others

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll