header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Having the final say

web_mason_0

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Brooke v Purton (Huntley) [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 262 (Mar) Mr Huntley wished to leave his estate between his partner, and five children in equal shares. As his estate was substantial (mainly comprising a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company), he was concerned about the children’s ability to manage a large inheritance. In order to meet Huntley’s aims and concerns, his adviser, a 2-years’ qualified private client solicitor, suggested including Huntley’s business assets (which would benefit from business and agricultural property relief) in a discretionary trust which could be managed by the trustees.

 

In drafting the will, the solicitor included a clause establishing a nil rate band discretionary trust which she had adopted wholesale from the firm’s precedent library. However, she overlooked the fact that, whereas a nil rate band discretionary trust was usually used in conjunction with gifting to an exempt beneficiary, in this case there was no spouse and a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll