header-logo header-logo

Having the final say

23 May 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
web_mason_0

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Brooke v Purton (Huntley) [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 262 (Mar) Mr Huntley wished to leave his estate between his partner, and five children in equal shares. As his estate was substantial (mainly comprising a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company), he was concerned about the children’s ability to manage a large inheritance. In order to meet Huntley’s aims and concerns, his adviser, a 2-years’ qualified private client solicitor, suggested including Huntley’s business assets (which would benefit from business and agricultural property relief) in a discretionary trust which could be managed by the trustees.

 

In drafting the will, the solicitor included a clause establishing a nil rate band discretionary trust which she had adopted wholesale from the firm’s precedent library. However, she overlooked the fact that, whereas a nil rate band discretionary trust was usually used in conjunction with gifting to an exempt beneficiary, in this case there was no spouse and a number of chargeable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll