header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Having the final say

web_mason_0

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Brooke v Purton (Huntley) [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 262 (Mar) Mr Huntley wished to leave his estate between his partner, and five children in equal shares. As his estate was substantial (mainly comprising a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company), he was concerned about the children’s ability to manage a large inheritance. In order to meet Huntley’s aims and concerns, his adviser, a 2-years’ qualified private client solicitor, suggested including Huntley’s business assets (which would benefit from business and agricultural property relief) in a discretionary trust which could be managed by the trustees.

 

In drafting the will, the solicitor included a clause establishing a nil rate band discretionary trust which she had adopted wholesale from the firm’s precedent library. However, she overlooked the fact that, whereas a nil rate band discretionary trust was usually used in conjunction with gifting to an exempt beneficiary, in this case there was no spouse and a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll