header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Having the final say

web_mason_0

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Brooke v Purton (Huntley) [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 262 (Mar) Mr Huntley wished to leave his estate between his partner, and five children in equal shares. As his estate was substantial (mainly comprising a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company), he was concerned about the children’s ability to manage a large inheritance. In order to meet Huntley’s aims and concerns, his adviser, a 2-years’ qualified private client solicitor, suggested including Huntley’s business assets (which would benefit from business and agricultural property relief) in a discretionary trust which could be managed by the trustees.

 

In drafting the will, the solicitor included a clause establishing a nil rate band discretionary trust which she had adopted wholesale from the firm’s precedent library. However, she overlooked the fact that, whereas a nil rate band discretionary trust was usually used in conjunction with gifting to an exempt beneficiary, in this case there was no spouse and a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll