header-logo header-logo

Health & social care levy

08 September 2021
Issue: 7947 / Categories: Legal News , Public , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

The government has set out its plans to finance health and social care through a new levy, amid noisy scenes in the House of Commons.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a 1.25% rise in National Insurance and on share dividends from April 2022. From April 2023, the rise will be separated so that it appears on payslips as ‘Health and Social Care Levy’, indicating it is ringfenced for health and social care. Working adults above pensionable age will pay the levy from April 2023.

The government forecasts the levy will raise nearly £36 billion over three years for frontline services. It intends to reform social care and bring health and social care provision closer.

An individual’s contributions to their own care will be capped at a lifetime contribution of £86,000, applying to anyone starting care after October 2023. The rest will be paid by public funds. Responding to a question from Jeremy Wright MP, Johnson confirmed the cap would apply to all those with care needs, regardless of age.

Those with assets of less than £20,000 will pay nothing (an increase of the threshold from £14,000), and those with less than £100,000 worth of assets will have their costs subsidised.

The changes will apply to England only. However, Johnson promised Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would get an extra £2.2bn per year.

Johnson acknowledged he was breaking a manifesto commitment but said ‘a global pandemic was in no-one’s manifesto’.

Opposition leader Keir Starmer QC said the funding issue predated the pandemic.

Currently, there is no ceiling on costs an individual must pay for social care in England, although those with less than £23,250 savings and assets are eligible for help from their council.

Under the new tax, about 6.2m people earning less than £9,568 will pay nothing extra. The government calculates about 40% of small businesses will pay nothing extra.

Issue: 7947 / Categories: Legal News , Public , National Health Service
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll