header-logo header-logo

Health & wealth

14 June 2012 / Rehana Azib
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Rehana Azib examines recent decisions on liability & quantum

There have been two interesting decisions in the area of employer’s liability and health and safety, both for and against employers.

Employers liability

David Brian Chandler v Cape plc In David Brian Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525, [2012] All ER (D) 123 (Apr), an asbestos exposure case, the Court of Appeal outlined the circumstances in which it could impose responsibility on a parent company for the health and safety of employees of a subsidiary company which was no longer in existence.

In this case, the subsidiary company was in the business of manufacturing incombustible asbestos and while in its employment, the claimant was exposed to asbestos dust and later contracted asbestosis, some 45 years after his employment with the company had ended. Unfortunately, the company had had no policy of insurance that would indemnify it against claims for asbestosis (the claimant’s employment pre-dated the Employers’ Liability Compulsory Insurance Act 1969). The claimant issued proceedings against the parent company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll