header-logo header-logo

Health & wealth

14 June 2012 / Rehana Azib
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Rehana Azib examines recent decisions on liability & quantum

There have been two interesting decisions in the area of employer’s liability and health and safety, both for and against employers.

Employers liability

David Brian Chandler v Cape plc In David Brian Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525, [2012] All ER (D) 123 (Apr), an asbestos exposure case, the Court of Appeal outlined the circumstances in which it could impose responsibility on a parent company for the health and safety of employees of a subsidiary company which was no longer in existence.

In this case, the subsidiary company was in the business of manufacturing incombustible asbestos and while in its employment, the claimant was exposed to asbestos dust and later contracted asbestosis, some 45 years after his employment with the company had ended. Unfortunately, the company had had no policy of insurance that would indemnify it against claims for asbestosis (the claimant’s employment pre-dated the Employers’ Liability Compulsory Insurance Act 1969). The claimant issued proceedings against the parent company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll