header-logo header-logo

15 January 2015 / Ed Pepperall
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , CPR
printer mail-detail

The heart of the matter

pepperall

Ed Pepperall QC provides an insider’s guide to the new look Part 36

A new look Part 36 comes into force on 6 April 2015. In its first major review of Part 36 in eight years, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC), of which I am a member and chairman of the sub-committee responsible for drafting the new Part 36, has addressed some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice.

Part 36 undoubtedly lies at the heart of the Civil Procedure Rules. Its machinery is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast track claims to billion-pound litigation in the Commercial Court. It is therefore important to ensure that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose. Just as importantly, if the steady flow of satellite litigation is to abate, Part 36 must work predictably and logically.

Other commentators will, no doubt, provide a critique of the new rules and lament the missed opportunity to effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll