header-logo header-logo

The heart of the matter

15 January 2015 / Ed Pepperall
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , CPR
printer mail-detail
pepperall

Ed Pepperall QC provides an insider’s guide to the new look Part 36

A new look Part 36 comes into force on 6 April 2015. In its first major review of Part 36 in eight years, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC), of which I am a member and chairman of the sub-committee responsible for drafting the new Part 36, has addressed some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice.

Part 36 undoubtedly lies at the heart of the Civil Procedure Rules. Its machinery is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast track claims to billion-pound litigation in the Commercial Court. It is therefore important to ensure that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose. Just as importantly, if the steady flow of satellite litigation is to abate, Part 36 must work predictably and logically.

Other commentators will, no doubt, provide a critique of the new rules and lament the missed opportunity to effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll