header-logo header-logo

24 November 2017 / Dr Timothy J Dodsworth , Christopher Bisping
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The heat is on

nlj_7771_dodsworth

Could a cap on gas & electricity harm customers in the long run? Christopher Bisping & Dr Timothy J Dodsworth report

  • Government proposals to cap unit prices for gas and electricity will have a negative effect on competition.
  • Regulation of the roll-over process, at the end of a contract term, would fulfil the desired objectives without reducing competition.

Recently the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy published its Draft Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill, outlining proposals to allow Ofgem, the regulator, to cap unit prices for gas and electricity which are supplied on the standard variable tariff (SVT). The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy suggests that the cap is designed to make the market ‘truly competitive’ and to protect vulnerable and low-income customers from expensive tariffs. However, the measures proposed are not only internally incoherent but—judging from our research into mobile phone contracts—will have the opposite effect to what the government hopes to achieve (The Pythagorean Regulation of Cell Phone Contracts—A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll