header-logo header-logo

The heat is on

24 November 2017 / Dr Timothy J Dodsworth , Christopher Bisping
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7771_dodsworth

Could a cap on gas & electricity harm customers in the long run? Christopher Bisping & Dr Timothy J Dodsworth report

  • Government proposals to cap unit prices for gas and electricity will have a negative effect on competition.
  • Regulation of the roll-over process, at the end of a contract term, would fulfil the desired objectives without reducing competition.

Recently the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy published its Draft Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill, outlining proposals to allow Ofgem, the regulator, to cap unit prices for gas and electricity which are supplied on the standard variable tariff (SVT). The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy suggests that the cap is designed to make the market ‘truly competitive’ and to protect vulnerable and low-income customers from expensive tariffs. However, the measures proposed are not only internally incoherent but—judging from our research into mobile phone contracts—will have the opposite effect to what the government hopes to achieve (The Pythagorean Regulation of Cell Phone Contracts—A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll