header-logo header-logo

Heathrow expansion lawful, Justices rule

16 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Aviation , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail
Government policy supporting a third runway at Heathrow is lawful, the Supreme Court has held

The court unanimously overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision in February, which found the government had failed to take account of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, which the UK ratified in 2016. The Paris Agreement enshrines an aspiration to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions during the second half of the 21st century.

The decision, in R (Friends of the Earth & Ors) v Heathrow Airport [2020] UKSC 52, means Heathrow can now proceed to seek planning permission.

However, the judgment notes that ‘since the designation of the Airports National Policy Strategy, the statutory target has been made more stringent. The figure of 100% was substituted for 80% in s 1 of the Climate Change Act 2008 by the Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019/1056’.

Will Rundle, head of legal at Friends of the Earth, said: ‘This judgment is no “green light” for expansion.

‘It makes clear that full climate considerations remain to be addressed and resolved at the planning stage. Heathrow expansion remains very far from certain and we now look forward to stopping the third runway in the planning arena.

‘With ever stronger climate policy commitments that Heathrow must meet, it remains unlikely it will ever get planning permission for the third runway.’

Rowan Smith, solicitor at Leigh Day, which acted for Friends of the Earth, said: ‘Given those obligations and targets have become much more challenging since the Airports National Policy Strategy was designated and are only expected to get tougher, especially in light of the advice by the Committee on Climate Change that, in order to meet Net Zero Target, there should be no net increase in airport capacity, this judgment represents a huge advancement in our client’s continuing battle against the third runway and the climate catastrophe facing the world.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll