header-logo header-logo

30 September 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Hedging your bets

Karen O’Sullivan considers when a local authority is liable for a lapse in its statutory powers to maintain the highway

How easy is it to sue a Highway Authority for failing to maintain a highway when the failure doesn’t relate to the road or pavement surface? Past authorities have (as was acknowledged by the House of Lords) created some confusion as to the extent, if at all, a local authority is liable to a road-user for breach of statutory duty. This came up for substantial discussion in the recent decision of Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] All ER (D) 118 (Jul) where the Court of Appeal considered the House of Lords’ decision of Gorringe v Calderdale MBC [2004] All ER (D) 06 (Apr).

In Gorringe the claimant approached the crest of a hill where the road narrowed. She was driving too fast and collided with an oncoming bus, causing horrific injury. She sued the local authority for its failure to exercise its statutory powers under s 39(2) of the Road Traffic Act 1988

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll