header-logo header-logo

23 October 2015 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Held to account

nlj_7673_parpworth

MPs lobbying ministers: a basis for legal challenge? Neil Parpworth reports

It is well understood that one of the main roles of the backbench MP at Westminster is to hold the government of the day to account for its acts and omissions. In practice, this can be achieved through various means, including written and oral questions to ministers, debates in parliament and the work of departmental select committees on which MPs may serve. While these opportunities mostly arise in a formal setting, access to ministers may also be obtained behind the scenes, in the tea room and bars of the House of Commons or when MPs vote by passing through the “Aye” or “No” lobbies which adjoin the chamber. Indeed, the opportunity which this archaic form of voting presents to a backbench MP to buttonhole a minister in the absence of the minister’s retinue appears to be a key reason why the Westminster Parliament continues to eschew electronic voting. With the doors of the lobbies locked and MPs waiting to file through, a backbencher has the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll