header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Held to account (Pt 2)

nlj_7717_parpworth

MPs must exercise caution when lobbying in regard to quasi-judicial functions, says Neil Parpworth

  • An MP’s lobbying activities may be the subject of a potentially successful legal challenge where they transgress the long-established standards of fairness.
  • While MPs are entitled to lobby ministers at any time regarding purely constituency matters, they may need to be more circumspect where the minister is exercising a quasi-judicial function.

It may be sometime before the febrile atmosphere which currently prevails in Westminster dies down. When it does and a sense of normality returns, MPs will once again be able to focus more exclusively on the traditional aspects of their vocation, such as holding the executive to account and representing the interests of their constituents. In seeking to do the latter, they may often find it necessary to lobby ministers on a range of matters and in a variety of contexts. The means at hand for doing so include letters, e-mails, formal meetings in a minister’s office and less formal encounters, such as in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll