header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Held to account (Pt 2)

nlj_7717_parpworth

MPs must exercise caution when lobbying in regard to quasi-judicial functions, says Neil Parpworth

  • An MP’s lobbying activities may be the subject of a potentially successful legal challenge where they transgress the long-established standards of fairness.
  • While MPs are entitled to lobby ministers at any time regarding purely constituency matters, they may need to be more circumspect where the minister is exercising a quasi-judicial function.

It may be sometime before the febrile atmosphere which currently prevails in Westminster dies down. When it does and a sense of normality returns, MPs will once again be able to focus more exclusively on the traditional aspects of their vocation, such as holding the executive to account and representing the interests of their constituents. In seeking to do the latter, they may often find it necessary to lobby ministers on a range of matters and in a variety of contexts. The means at hand for doing so include letters, e-mails, formal meetings in a minister’s office and less formal encounters, such as in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll