header-logo header-logo

Held to account (Pt 2)

09 September 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7717_parpworth

MPs must exercise caution when lobbying in regard to quasi-judicial functions, says Neil Parpworth

  • An MP’s lobbying activities may be the subject of a potentially successful legal challenge where they transgress the long-established standards of fairness.
  • While MPs are entitled to lobby ministers at any time regarding purely constituency matters, they may need to be more circumspect where the minister is exercising a quasi-judicial function.

It may be sometime before the febrile atmosphere which currently prevails in Westminster dies down. When it does and a sense of normality returns, MPs will once again be able to focus more exclusively on the traditional aspects of their vocation, such as holding the executive to account and representing the interests of their constituents. In seeking to do the latter, they may often find it necessary to lobby ministers on a range of matters and in a variety of contexts. The means at hand for doing so include letters, e-mails, formal meetings in a minister’s office and less formal encounters, such as in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll