header-logo header-logo

Helmet breaks copyright frontier

03 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The force was with the manufacturer of the original Star Wars stormtrooper helmets in a Supreme Court hearing on copyright last week

The justices unanimously held that the helmets are not works of sculpture and therefore not protected by UK copyright law, in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39.

They also held—in a “major” change of policy—that foreign copyright infringement claims can be brought in the English courts.

The defendant made the helmets for the first Star Wars film in 1976. In 2004, he began to produce and sell replicas. In 2006, Lucasfilm obtained judgment in default through the US courts.

In order to bring their case in England, Lucasfilm argued that the design was an artistic work and covered by copyright law. If it was a functional design then copyright protection would not apply.
Martyn Fish, partner at HGF Law, said: “It means any foreign company can try to enforce copyright in the UK courts, which is a major change.

“A lot of IP lawyers will be surprised by this judgment. It’s good news for us though as it may mean more work. It’s one more way of enforcing the law and may provide clients with a stronger remedy. I would be amazed if forum shopping didn’t take place.”

Danielle Amor, associate at Hogan Lovells, said: “Before now, you needed to litigate the infringements separately in each jurisdiction where your rights had been infringed.

“Claimants may now be able to bring actions in the UK against UK resident defendants for infringement of their rights in multiple jurisdictions.”

Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll