header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Hodge M Malek
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Help & hindrance

Hodge M Malek QC weighs up the pros & cons of disclosure

One of the great contrasts between civilian law jurisdictions as found in Continental Europe and those founded upon the common law is the extent of disclosure in civil proceedings. An English lawyer may argue how can a trial be fair unless both parties disclose to each other those documents which assist or undermine their respective cases? However the pursuit of disclosure can be a barrier to there being a trial at all.

The system of disclosure by list of a party’s relevant documents goes back to the nineteenth century. At that time the number of disclosable documents were generally few in number. The photocopier and computer have completely transformed things. Disclosure now may require a party to sift through and potentially disclose a large amount of material. The explosion in data has made disclosure a major burden, in terms of time, cost and case management.

Rationale for disclosure

The benefits of disclosure can be easily stated. It allows informed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll