header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Hodge M Malek
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Help & hindrance

Hodge M Malek QC weighs up the pros & cons of disclosure

One of the great contrasts between civilian law jurisdictions as found in Continental Europe and those founded upon the common law is the extent of disclosure in civil proceedings. An English lawyer may argue how can a trial be fair unless both parties disclose to each other those documents which assist or undermine their respective cases? However the pursuit of disclosure can be a barrier to there being a trial at all.

The system of disclosure by list of a party’s relevant documents goes back to the nineteenth century. At that time the number of disclosable documents were generally few in number. The photocopier and computer have completely transformed things. Disclosure now may require a party to sift through and potentially disclose a large amount of material. The explosion in data has made disclosure a major burden, in terms of time, cost and case management.

Rationale for disclosure

The benefits of disclosure can be easily stated. It allows informed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll