header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Hodge M Malek
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Help & hindrance

Hodge M Malek QC weighs up the pros & cons of disclosure

One of the great contrasts between civilian law jurisdictions as found in Continental Europe and those founded upon the common law is the extent of disclosure in civil proceedings. An English lawyer may argue how can a trial be fair unless both parties disclose to each other those documents which assist or undermine their respective cases? However the pursuit of disclosure can be a barrier to there being a trial at all.

The system of disclosure by list of a party’s relevant documents goes back to the nineteenth century. At that time the number of disclosable documents were generally few in number. The photocopier and computer have completely transformed things. Disclosure now may require a party to sift through and potentially disclose a large amount of material. The explosion in data has made disclosure a major burden, in terms of time, cost and case management.

Rationale for disclosure

The benefits of disclosure can be easily stated. It allows informed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll