header-logo header-logo

05 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Help vulnerable parties more, judges advised

Vulnerable claimants and defendants should be given more support, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has said in a report with seven recommendations for change.

The report, launched this week, was prompted by specific recommendations made by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. However, the CJC considers issues arising in all types of litigation.

Difficulties faced by court users include intimidation from more powerful parties, fear of reprisal in anti-social behaviour cases, and confusion or lack of understanding through not being able to understand the language or terminology used in court.

There are currently no specific rules in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) relating to vulnerable witnesses and parties, although it allows the use of many of the protections used by the criminal and family courts.

The CJC recommends amending the CPR to ensure all parties can effectively participate; amending the request information regarding vulnerable parties; training judges on vulnerability issues; producing guidance for intermediaries; preparing operational protocols; training staff on vulnerability issues; and considering guidance and training on compensation orders.

Responses to the consultation report, ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties within civil proceedings’, should be made by 11 October 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll