header-logo header-logo

Help vulnerable parties more, judges advised

05 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Vulnerable claimants and defendants should be given more support, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has said in a report with seven recommendations for change.

The report, launched this week, was prompted by specific recommendations made by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. However, the CJC considers issues arising in all types of litigation.

Difficulties faced by court users include intimidation from more powerful parties, fear of reprisal in anti-social behaviour cases, and confusion or lack of understanding through not being able to understand the language or terminology used in court.

There are currently no specific rules in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) relating to vulnerable witnesses and parties, although it allows the use of many of the protections used by the criminal and family courts.

The CJC recommends amending the CPR to ensure all parties can effectively participate; amending the request information regarding vulnerable parties; training judges on vulnerability issues; producing guidance for intermediaries; preparing operational protocols; training staff on vulnerability issues; and considering guidance and training on compensation orders.

Responses to the consultation report, ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties within civil proceedings’, should be made by 11 October 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll