header-logo header-logo

Help vulnerable parties more, judges advised

05 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Vulnerable claimants and defendants should be given more support, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has said in a report with seven recommendations for change.

The report, launched this week, was prompted by specific recommendations made by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. However, the CJC considers issues arising in all types of litigation.

Difficulties faced by court users include intimidation from more powerful parties, fear of reprisal in anti-social behaviour cases, and confusion or lack of understanding through not being able to understand the language or terminology used in court.

There are currently no specific rules in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) relating to vulnerable witnesses and parties, although it allows the use of many of the protections used by the criminal and family courts.

The CJC recommends amending the CPR to ensure all parties can effectively participate; amending the request information regarding vulnerable parties; training judges on vulnerability issues; producing guidance for intermediaries; preparing operational protocols; training staff on vulnerability issues; and considering guidance and training on compensation orders.

Responses to the consultation report, ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties within civil proceedings’, should be made by 11 October 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll