header-logo header-logo

Help vulnerable parties more, judges advised

05 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Vulnerable claimants and defendants should be given more support, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has said in a report with seven recommendations for change.

The report, launched this week, was prompted by specific recommendations made by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. However, the CJC considers issues arising in all types of litigation.

Difficulties faced by court users include intimidation from more powerful parties, fear of reprisal in anti-social behaviour cases, and confusion or lack of understanding through not being able to understand the language or terminology used in court.

There are currently no specific rules in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) relating to vulnerable witnesses and parties, although it allows the use of many of the protections used by the criminal and family courts.

The CJC recommends amending the CPR to ensure all parties can effectively participate; amending the request information regarding vulnerable parties; training judges on vulnerability issues; producing guidance for intermediaries; preparing operational protocols; training staff on vulnerability issues; and considering guidance and training on compensation orders.

Responses to the consultation report, ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties within civil proceedings’, should be made by 11 October 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
back-to-top-scroll