header-logo header-logo

26 April 2023
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Helping solicitors in need

The Solicitors’ Charity supported 50% more solicitors in the past year, according to its annual ‘Big Report’. 

The report, published last week, also shows a rise in clients with multiple health conditions and mental health issues. The charity awarded £962,229, with an additional £25,316 in secured loans. Payments covered necessities such as household equipment, medical aids and living allowances. One-off payments also covered fuel bills.

CEO Nick Gallagher said the charity provides practical, emotional and financial support.

Recipients included a London conveyancer with no job, in debt and a family fallout which had left him homeless.

Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll