header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Heyday challenge

The UK’s national retirement exemption has passed its first test, says Charles Pigott

Amid the current economic gloom there has been some good news for the government. At the end of last month Advocate General Jan Mazák published his opinion in the Heyday litigation (Age Concern England v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2008] All ER (D) 44). If followed by the European Court of Justice (ECJ), it will make it easier for the government to defend the controversial provision which largely removes employees aged 65 or over from the protection of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031).

Two years ago Heyday, an organisation linked to Age Concern, issued judicial review proceedings against BERR— formerly the DTI—the government department which had sponsored the Regulations, which were passed to implement the age strand of the Employment Framework Directive (2006/78/EC). Heyday challenged reg 30, which, subject to procedural safeguards, prevents employees who have reached 65 from bringing age discrimination claims when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll