header-logo header-logo

The Heyday challenge

16 October 2008 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

The UK’s national retirement exemption has passed its first test, says Charles Pigott

Amid the current economic gloom there has been some good news for the government. At the end of last month Advocate General Jan Mazák published his opinion in the Heyday litigation (Age Concern England v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2008] All ER (D) 44). If followed by the European Court of Justice (ECJ), it will make it easier for the government to defend the controversial provision which largely removes employees aged 65 or over from the protection of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031).

Two years ago Heyday, an organisation linked to Age Concern, issued judicial review proceedings against BERR— formerly the DTI—the government department which had sponsored the Regulations, which were passed to implement the age strand of the Employment Framework Directive (2006/78/EC). Heyday challenged reg 30, which, subject to procedural safeguards, prevents employees who have reached 65 from bringing age discrimination claims when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll