header-logo header-logo

04 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Clinical negligence , National Health Service , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

High cost of clinical negligence outlined

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has urged the government to move towards a less adversarial system of clinical negligence, after the total cost to the NHS quadrupled within 20 years to an eye-watering £60bn

The PAC report, ‘Costs of clinical negligence’, published last week, highlighted ‘disproportionate legal costs’ with claimant legal fees more than tripling to £538m in 2024-25. Lower value claims with damages of £25,000 or less cost 3.7 times more in legal fees than victims received in damages.

In terms of types of case, brain injury suffered during maternity care represented 2% of all claims by volume but the damages accounted for 68% of total costs.

One factor behind the increasing costs is that claims are settled based on how much care would cost in the private sector rather than the NHS, which stems from a 1948 law. The PAC said this means the taxpayer may pay twice for clinical negligence—once for compensation and again if the victims uses the NHS for their care.

The PAC called on the government to produce within two months a national framework for improving patient safety with annual targets, and a national system for sharing data between NHS trusts. It called, in particular, for a government plan to improve maternity care and reduce the cost of claims in this area.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, PAC chair, said a less adversarial system would reduce costs and ensure claims are paid more quickly.

Dr Pallavi Bradshaw, medical director at Medical Protection Society, which assists healthcare professionals, said: ‘The government simply cannot afford to do nothing. A comprehensive strategy—which balances fair compensation for patients and affordability for the NHS—is urgently needed. This strategy must iron out the many inequities and flaws in the system—not least disproportionate legal fees in lower-value claims.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll