header-logo header-logo

High days & pay-offs

22 October 2009 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Smith celebrates the highs & lows of recent tribunal decisions

In a month notable for the high-profile rejection of the “Heyday” challenge to the default retirement age of 65, but in a way that strongly suggested that it will need to be removed when the government carries out its promised review of it (now to be in 2010 rather than 2011 as originally indicated) and for the equally newsworthy decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that an employee who is sick while taking holiday can ask for the holiday to be rescheduled, the cases considered here are at the opposite end of the employment law spectrum where there is no obvious news and/or political interest, but where pronouncements on points of common law or statutory interpretation can have just as great an effect on the longer-term development of the law.

Ultra vires contracts

While it has always been clear that employment under an illegal contract is potentially void, destroying any rights, what is the position where the contract is ultra

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll