header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

A high hurdle

rbs1_08_4

Protecting privacy under PHA 1997 can be a tough task, note Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) is a versatile and wide-ranging statute that has come the full circle since its amendment by the coming into force of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PFA 2012). PHA 1997 was originally envisaged as an Act to prevent stalking and to punish stalkers. However, as the authors have previously discussed, by omitting reference specifically to “stalking” and instead focusing on a much broader offence of harassment (undefined, but “includes causing alarm or distress”) PHA 1997 is of much wider application. However, following lengthy Parliamentary consultation (which the authors were privileged to have been involved in) PFA 2012 (which received Royal Assent on 1 May 2012) introduced two new offences specifically of stalking. PHA 1997 remains one of the most flexible pieces of legislation of recent years.

Not always a remedy

However, PHA 1997, while able to be utilised in various circumstances, will not always provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll