header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 September 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

A high hurdle

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
rbs1_08_4

Protecting privacy under PHA 1997 can be a tough task, note Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) is a versatile and wide-ranging statute that has come the full circle since its amendment by the coming into force of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PFA 2012). PHA 1997 was originally envisaged as an Act to prevent stalking and to punish stalkers. However, as the authors have previously discussed, by omitting reference specifically to “stalking” and instead focusing on a much broader offence of harassment (undefined, but “includes causing alarm or distress”) PHA 1997 is of much wider application. However, following lengthy Parliamentary consultation (which the authors were privileged to have been involved in) PFA 2012 (which received Royal Assent on 1 May 2012) introduced two new offences specifically of stalking. PHA 1997 remains one of the most flexible pieces of legislation of recent years.

Not always a remedy

However, PHA 1997, while able to be utilised in various circumstances, will not always provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll