header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

A high hurdle

rbs1_08_4

Protecting privacy under PHA 1997 can be a tough task, note Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) is a versatile and wide-ranging statute that has come the full circle since its amendment by the coming into force of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PFA 2012). PHA 1997 was originally envisaged as an Act to prevent stalking and to punish stalkers. However, as the authors have previously discussed, by omitting reference specifically to “stalking” and instead focusing on a much broader offence of harassment (undefined, but “includes causing alarm or distress”) PHA 1997 is of much wider application. However, following lengthy Parliamentary consultation (which the authors were privileged to have been involved in) PFA 2012 (which received Royal Assent on 1 May 2012) introduced two new offences specifically of stalking. PHA 1997 remains one of the most flexible pieces of legislation of recent years.

Not always a remedy

However, PHA 1997, while able to be utilised in various circumstances, will not always provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll