header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Chris Jeyes
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Public , Banking
printer mail-detail

Highly charged?

Chris Jeyes examines the campaign to recover allegedly unfair bank charges

The rebellion by consumers against charges imposed by banks for unauthorised borrowing has been gathering momentum. The revelation that the banks’ annual profits will amount to several billion pounds has done little to calm the storm. One high-profile example is the claim brought by barrister Tom Brennan, recently adjourned at the City of London County Court, in which there is even a claim for exemplary damages.

Several websites, such as www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk, provide templates and documents for use in complaining and ultimately for launching proceedings for reclaiming bank charges. One website claims that more than one million people have downloaded complaint forms and template letters.

As a result, the civil justice system is facing an increasing number of such claims. Claimants are, almost without exception, unrepresented, although some have been assisted by lay consultants. There have been some rather misconceived claims; in the first case to come to trial in one northern county court the claimant sought to recover all overdraft interest paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll