header-logo header-logo

Highly charged?

20 April 2007 / Chris Jeyes
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Public , Banking
printer mail-detail

Chris Jeyes examines the campaign to recover allegedly unfair bank charges

The rebellion by consumers against charges imposed by banks for unauthorised borrowing has been gathering momentum. The revelation that the banks’ annual profits will amount to several billion pounds has done little to calm the storm. One high-profile example is the claim brought by barrister Tom Brennan, recently adjourned at the City of London County Court, in which there is even a claim for exemplary damages.

Several websites, such as www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk, provide templates and documents for use in complaining and ultimately for launching proceedings for reclaiming bank charges. One website claims that more than one million people have downloaded complaint forms and template letters.

As a result, the civil justice system is facing an increasing number of such claims. Claimants are, almost without exception, unrepresented, although some have been assisted by lay consultants. There have been some rather misconceived claims; in the first case to come to trial in one northern county court the claimant sought to recover all overdraft interest paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll