header-logo header-logo

Highly charged?

20 April 2007 / Chris Jeyes
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Public , Banking
printer mail-detail

Chris Jeyes examines the campaign to recover allegedly unfair bank charges

The rebellion by consumers against charges imposed by banks for unauthorised borrowing has been gathering momentum. The revelation that the banks’ annual profits will amount to several billion pounds has done little to calm the storm. One high-profile example is the claim brought by barrister Tom Brennan, recently adjourned at the City of London County Court, in which there is even a claim for exemplary damages.

Several websites, such as www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk, provide templates and documents for use in complaining and ultimately for launching proceedings for reclaiming bank charges. One website claims that more than one million people have downloaded complaint forms and template letters.

As a result, the civil justice system is facing an increasing number of such claims. Claimants are, almost without exception, unrepresented, although some have been assisted by lay consultants. There have been some rather misconceived claims; in the first case to come to trial in one northern county court the claimant sought to recover all overdraft interest paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll