header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Chris Jeyes
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Public , Banking
printer mail-detail

Highly charged?

Chris Jeyes examines the campaign to recover allegedly unfair bank charges

The rebellion by consumers against charges imposed by banks for unauthorised borrowing has been gathering momentum. The revelation that the banks’ annual profits will amount to several billion pounds has done little to calm the storm. One high-profile example is the claim brought by barrister Tom Brennan, recently adjourned at the City of London County Court, in which there is even a claim for exemplary damages.

Several websites, such as www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk, provide templates and documents for use in complaining and ultimately for launching proceedings for reclaiming bank charges. One website claims that more than one million people have downloaded complaint forms and template letters.

As a result, the civil justice system is facing an increasing number of such claims. Claimants are, almost without exception, unrepresented, although some have been assisted by lay consultants. There have been some rather misconceived claims; in the first case to come to trial in one northern county court the claimant sought to recover all overdraft interest paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll