header-logo header-logo

HIPS—what next?

16 August 2007 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Doing nothing about HIPs is not an option, says Peter Ambrose

With the rollout of home information packs (HIPs) finally underway, it is becoming apparent that the initial fears of solicitors that they would spell the end of residential conveyancing appear to be lessening. Indeed, for many solicitors, workloads have never been higher, and the introduction of HIPs seems unlikely to dent their business.

The delay to the introduction of HIPs has definitely been a blessing to the property market and the initial four-bedroom rule means their impact on the house selling process has been significantly reduced. However, for solicitors, the question remains about how to get involved with HIPs and what is the most prudent approach.

Media coverage about HIPs only being required for four bedroomed properties or larger has raised awareness of this restriction. However, the triggers for the introduction of HIPs for smaller properties are less well known. The government recommended that when there are over 2,000 domestic energy assessors (DEAs) accredited, HIPs will be extended to three bedroom properties—a significant portion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll