header-logo header-logo

HIPS—what next?

16 August 2007 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Doing nothing about HIPs is not an option, says Peter Ambrose

With the rollout of home information packs (HIPs) finally underway, it is becoming apparent that the initial fears of solicitors that they would spell the end of residential conveyancing appear to be lessening. Indeed, for many solicitors, workloads have never been higher, and the introduction of HIPs seems unlikely to dent their business.

The delay to the introduction of HIPs has definitely been a blessing to the property market and the initial four-bedroom rule means their impact on the house selling process has been significantly reduced. However, for solicitors, the question remains about how to get involved with HIPs and what is the most prudent approach.

Media coverage about HIPs only being required for four bedroomed properties or larger has raised awareness of this restriction. However, the triggers for the introduction of HIPs for smaller properties are less well known. The government recommended that when there are over 2,000 domestic energy assessors (DEAs) accredited, HIPs will be extended to three bedroom properties—a significant portion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll