header-logo header-logo

HMRC: a nudge too far?

25 September 2015
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Department accused of pressurising taxpayers with “nudge letters”

A tax lawyer has accused HMRC of circumventing normal dispute resolution processes by using “nudge” letters to pressurise individuals.

Adam Craggs, tax partner at RPC, claims HMRC are sending “carefully crafted” letters directly to taxpayers who dispute their tax bill, warning, for example, that they win the majority of cases that don’t settle and that the taxpayer may attract adverse publicity.

Craggs says he has replied to HMRC on behalf of clients with appeals pending at the tax tribunal to ask them not to send any more letters, and HMRC gave a “short, unsympathetic response”.

He says: “My clients find it intimidating. There is an anomaly here, in that solicitors are under a professional duty not to write directly to individuals, but HMRC officers do not have the same obligation. They’re very effective. They spook clients, who get very worried.

“Not only is this a tactic designed to pressurise taxpayers into settling their dispute, it also demonstrates just how far HMRC is prepared to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll