header-logo header-logo

Hold the line

30 March 2007 / Michael Tennant
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michael Tennant outlines the potential benefits of using telephone hearings

Interlocutory hearings by telephone were regarded as a novelty when the civil justice reforms were introduced on 26 April 1999. They represented the first cautious step in the exploitation of technology in the context of civil court procedure.

Following the initial pilot operating in Newcastle upon Tyne—with the county courts at Bedford and Luton joining in later—the scheme was extended last year. Now, thanks to the 44th update of the Civil Procedure Rules, the scheme will join us permanently and nationally as from 6 April  2007.
Where the intent, a phone line and a conference receiver have coincided, telephone hearings have proved popular and saved considerable costs, particularly if the parties’ legal representatives are located some distance from the court.

Reviews and requests

It is a presumption that all allocation and listing hearings and interim applications, case management conferences and pre-trial reviews with a time estimate of less than an hour will be dealt with by telephone via a court service approved telecommunications provider. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll