header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Michael Tennant
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hold the line

Michael Tennant outlines the potential benefits of using telephone hearings

Interlocutory hearings by telephone were regarded as a novelty when the civil justice reforms were introduced on 26 April 1999. They represented the first cautious step in the exploitation of technology in the context of civil court procedure.

Following the initial pilot operating in Newcastle upon Tyne—with the county courts at Bedford and Luton joining in later—the scheme was extended last year. Now, thanks to the 44th update of the Civil Procedure Rules, the scheme will join us permanently and nationally as from 6 April  2007.
Where the intent, a phone line and a conference receiver have coincided, telephone hearings have proved popular and saved considerable costs, particularly if the parties’ legal representatives are located some distance from the court.

Reviews and requests

It is a presumption that all allocation and listing hearings and interim applications, case management conferences and pre-trial reviews with a time estimate of less than an hour will be dealt with by telephone via a court service approved telecommunications provider.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll