header-logo header-logo

Hold the line

30 March 2007 / Michael Tennant
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michael Tennant outlines the potential benefits of using telephone hearings

Interlocutory hearings by telephone were regarded as a novelty when the civil justice reforms were introduced on 26 April 1999. They represented the first cautious step in the exploitation of technology in the context of civil court procedure.

Following the initial pilot operating in Newcastle upon Tyne—with the county courts at Bedford and Luton joining in later—the scheme was extended last year. Now, thanks to the 44th update of the Civil Procedure Rules, the scheme will join us permanently and nationally as from 6 April  2007.
Where the intent, a phone line and a conference receiver have coincided, telephone hearings have proved popular and saved considerable costs, particularly if the parties’ legal representatives are located some distance from the court.

Reviews and requests

It is a presumption that all allocation and listing hearings and interim applications, case management conferences and pre-trial reviews with a time estimate of less than an hour will be dealt with by telephone via a court service approved telecommunications provider. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll