header-logo header-logo

13 January 2023 / Mani Singh Basi
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , International justice
printer mail-detail

Holiday abductions: far from home (Pt 3)

In the third part of his series on the Hague Convention, Mani Singh Basi offers advice on efficient timetabling & evidence of habitual residence
  • Provides some practical considerations which lawyers representing clients in 1980 Hague Convention proceedings must bear in mind.
  • Notes the Hague Convention exists to secure the swift return of children who have been wrongly removed from their home country.
  • Sets out processes which family practitioners should follow to ensure clients have the greatest opportunity to have their child returned.

The 1980 Hague Convention cases in the High Court are a specialist area of the law, and it is essential that practitioners working in this field stay on top of developments and procedures. To start with, Art 11 of the 1980 Hague Convention states the following:

‘The judicial or administrative authorities of Contracting States shall act expeditiously in proceedings for the return of children.

‘If the judicial or administrative authority concerned has not reached a decision within six weeks from the date of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll