header-logo header-logo

Holiday pay hell?

11 December 2014 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
johnson

What does Bear Scotland mean for employers, asks Sarah Johnson

The news has been full of holiday pay stories recently, but are employers facing holiday pay hell?

Yes, in that they will almost certainly have to include some variable payments, such as commission, in holiday pay, creating potentially significant liabilities. However, things looked a lot worse before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the joined cases of Bear Scotland Ltd and Others v Fulton and Others UKEATS/0047/13/BI, Hertel (UK) Limited v Woods and Others UKEAT/0160/14/SM and A mec Group Limited v Law and Others UKEAT/0161/14/SM (EAT decision).

Unite, the union representing the claimants, has now said it will not appeal.

Background

We are in this position because the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has held that our Working Time Regulations 1998 (regulations) do not comply with the European Working Time Directive (directive).

The directive provides employees/workers with at least four weeks’ paid annual leave in order to improve their health and safety. The UK “gold-plated” the directive, adding an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll