header-logo header-logo

14 October 2021
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Home Office policy held unlawful

Victims of trafficking should be granted leave to remain, the High Court has held in a landmark judgment

Ruling in R (oao KTT) v Home Secretary [2021] EWHC 2722 (Admin), Mr Justice Linden upheld the 33-year-old claimant’s case that she should have been granted leave to remain on the basis it was necessary due to ‘her personal situation ie in order to pursue her asylum and human rights claims based on her fear of being re-trafficked if she is returned to Vietnam’.

Linden J held Home Office policy on discretionary leave for victims of modern slavery breached Art 14 of the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking of Human Beings 2005, and was therefore unlawful. The decision will help thousands of trafficking victims.

The claimant suffers significant mental health issues as a result of being forced to work as a prostitute and on cannabis farms, Linden J said, and was unable to work, claim universal credit or gain training and education unless granted leave to remain.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll