header-logo header-logo

14 October 2021
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Home Office policy held unlawful

Victims of trafficking should be granted leave to remain, the High Court has held in a landmark judgment

Ruling in R (oao KTT) v Home Secretary [2021] EWHC 2722 (Admin), Mr Justice Linden upheld the 33-year-old claimant’s case that she should have been granted leave to remain on the basis it was necessary due to ‘her personal situation ie in order to pursue her asylum and human rights claims based on her fear of being re-trafficked if she is returned to Vietnam’.

Linden J held Home Office policy on discretionary leave for victims of modern slavery breached Art 14 of the Council of Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking of Human Beings 2005, and was therefore unlawful. The decision will help thousands of trafficking victims.

The claimant suffers significant mental health issues as a result of being forced to work as a prostitute and on cannabis farms, Linden J said, and was unable to work, claim universal credit or gain training and education unless granted leave to remain.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll