header-logo header-logo

At home with PAP

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Way
Lawbites

A pre-action protocol for residential mortgage possession claims based on arrears was forward and came into force on 19 November 2008. It covers first mortgages and subsequent mortgages and, as to the latter, whether regulated or unregulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Among the worthy provisions of the protocol— consideration to be given to postponement of a possession claim where the borrower can demonstrate that reasonable steps have been or will be taken to market at an appropriate price in accordance with reasonable professional advice; reasonable steps to be taken by the parties to discuss the cause of the arrears, the borrower’s financial circumstances and proposals for repayment of arrears; lender referral, where necessary, to appropriate sources of independent debt advice; written reasons by the lender within ten days for not agreeing any proposal for payment made by the borrower; and consideration to postponement of a claim where the borrower has made a genuine complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll