header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

At home with PAP

Civil Way
Lawbites

A pre-action protocol for residential mortgage possession claims based on arrears was forward and came into force on 19 November 2008. It covers first mortgages and subsequent mortgages and, as to the latter, whether regulated or unregulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Among the worthy provisions of the protocol— consideration to be given to postponement of a possession claim where the borrower can demonstrate that reasonable steps have been or will be taken to market at an appropriate price in accordance with reasonable professional advice; reasonable steps to be taken by the parties to discuss the cause of the arrears, the borrower’s financial circumstances and proposals for repayment of arrears; lender referral, where necessary, to appropriate sources of independent debt advice; written reasons by the lender within ten days for not agreeing any proposal for payment made by the borrower; and consideration to postponement of a claim where the borrower has made a genuine complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll